MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148427008 · doi:10.1142/s0217751x05026728

HOLOGRAPHIC MESONS: ADDING FLAVOR TO THE <font>ADS/CFT</font> DUALITY

2005· article· en· W2148427008 on OpenAlexafffund
Jordan Hovdebo, Martı́n Kruczenski, David Mateos, Robert C. Myers, David Winters

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics A · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueMcGill UniversityU.S. Department of EnergyMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsMesonSemiclassical physicsParticle physicsQuarkString (physics)Duality (order theory)Mathematical physicsQuantum mechanicsQuantum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study mesons in an [Formula: see text] super Yang-Mills theory with fundamental matter from its dual string theory on AdS 5 × S 5 with a D7-brane probe. For quarks with a finite mass m q , the meson spectrum is discrete and exhibits a mass gap of order [Formula: see text]. The spectrum of mesons with large spin J is obtained from semiclassical rotating open strings attached to the D7-brane. It displays Regge behaviour for [Formula: see text] whereas for [Formula: see text] it corresponds to that of two non-relativistic quarks bound by a Coulomb potential. We calculate 〈 Tr F 2 〉 around an isolated quark, to gain insight into the Regge behaviour of the spinning mesons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics ASame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207