MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148443233 · doi:10.1109/tbme.2009.2026735

Time–Frequency Phase Analysis of Ictal EEG Recordings With the S-Transform

2009· article· en· W2148443233 on OpenAlexaff
C. Robert Pinnegar, Houman Khosravani, Paolo Federico

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyTime–frequency analysisIctalWavelet transformComputer scienceFourier transformFrequency domainOffset (computer science)WaveletShort-time Fourier transformContinuous wavelet transformFourier analysisSignal processingPattern recognition (psychology)Speech recognitionArtificial intelligenceDiscrete wavelet transformMathematicsComputer visionNeuroscienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The calculation and visualization of temporal and phase information in the brain, such as during cognitive processes and epileptiform activity, is an important tool in EEG-based studies of physiological brain activation. To this end, we present a technique that estimates the phase and time offsets between different channels in EEG recordings of seizure activity. The offset information is visually combined with amplitude information to emphasize the most significant signal features. The estimates of phase and time offset are derived from the S-transform, a time-frequency representation that is similar to a windowed Fourier transform, but with a wavelet-like, scalable window. The phase offsets are obtained from the differences between phase spectra of S-transforms of different traces, and the time offsets are then obtained from the frequency-domain gradients of the phase offsets. This is analogous to the link between frequency "phase ramping" and time translation in ordinary Fourier analysis. In this paper, we present a synthetic example to help describe the method, and then show ictal EEG recordings from two human subjects. The differences between the recording times of spike-wave discharges at different electrodes exhibit behavior that is strongly dependent on time and frequency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical EngineeringSame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207