MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148448985 · doi:10.1051/eas:2005134

The effects of diffusion and winds on the properties of Helium White Dwarfs in Binary Millisecond Pulsars

2005· article· en· W2148448985 on OpenAlexaff
L. A. Nelson, Ernest Dubeau, Sylvain Turcotte

Bibliographic record

VenueEAS Publications Series · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsBishop's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMillisecond pulsarPhysicsWhite dwarfPulsarAstrophysicsNeutron starStellar evolutionHeliumDiffusionCommon envelopeMillisecondX-ray pulsarAstronomyStarsAtomic physicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wide Binary Millisecond Pulsars are composed of a rapidly spinning neutron star and a low-mass white dwarf. An important key to understanding the spin-down evolution of the pulsar is the determination of its age. Under the assumption that the pulsar and white dwarf formed coevally, the age of the pulsar can be inferred by comparing the observed temperature of the cooling white dwarf with evolutionary calculations. The rate of cooling is affected by the composition profile and thickness of the hydrogen-rich envelope. The latter property is largely governed by the evolution of the white-dwarf progenitor during the mass-loss phase of the evolution but is also affected to some degree by stellar winds and chemical diffusion. Based on an extensive analysis of parameter space, we find that self-induced stellar winds are not likely to have a significant effect on the cooling but that diffusion in the envelope can shorten the cooling times in some systems by a significant factor. This effect generally leads to better agreement between cooling and spin-down times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEAS Publications SeriesSame topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207