Accounting Marketing by Accounting Offices in the State of Sao Paulo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents a portion of the result of a research carried through between the last quarter of 2004 and the first quarter of 2005, to identify as 259 accounting services offices in the State of Sao Paulo use or not the Marketing tools. The study executed combined empirical research to identify excellent aspects about the reality of the offices, bibliographical revision, and field research, in its first stage by means of a depth interview with the partners of five offices, and later with the use of a questionnaire with 49 assertive, answered by the partners of the 259 accounting offices. The revision of literature disclosed international experiences in the use of the Marketing that can contribute the offices have one better image for its customers, and for the development of its businesses. The data collected with the questionnaires have been treated by the Descriptive Statistics and analyzed by the use of Mean, because the collected data was not adherent to the normal curve. The achieved results have disclosed that the use of the Marketing tools is intuitive and embryonic in the sector. The research supplies information that will serve of subsidy so that the accounting entrepreneurs adopt the Marketing tools as an alternative for bigger valuation of its services for the market, and an element of support to its business.Key-words: Marketing. Services marketing. Accounting marketing. Accounting services offices. Services. Accounting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".