MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148464903 · doi:10.7202/045670ar

L’enfer préasilaire à la fin du XIXe siècle et au début du XXe : perceptions, interprétations et discours masculins sur la folie des femmes mariées

2011· article· fr· W2148464903 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marie-Claude Thifault

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHistorical and Scientific Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’enquête de l’auteure dans les archives de l’hôpital Saint-Jean-de-Dieu lui a permis de découvrir, dans les dossiers médicaux des femmes mariées, des documents relatifs aux demandes d’internement rédigées par leur époux et leur médecin de famille. Ces traces du discours masculin révèlent les difficultés et les problèmes familiaux occasionnés par l’impossibilité de contrôler les comportements insanes de l’aliénée, épouse et mère de famille, avant son admission asilaire. Loin de faire de cette analyse de genre un plaidoyer fondé sur une croyance populaire, selon laquelle les femmes internées pour aliénation mentale n’étaient pas folles ou abandonnées par leur mari, l’auteure veut plutôt illustrer les perceptions et les interprétations des hommes concernant la folie des femmes mariées, interprétations incontestablement influencées par l’idéologie victorienne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.180
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches féministesSame topicHistorical and Scientific StudiesFrench-language works237,207