MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148477720 · doi:10.1300/j064v31n02_05

Agrobiodiversity: Its Value, Measurement, and Conservation in the Context of Sustainable Agriculture

2007· article· en· W2148477720 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sustainable Agriculture · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetically Modified Organisms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultural biodiversityContext (archaeology)Ex situ conservationAgricultureIn situ conservationAgroforestryConservation agricultureValue (mathematics)Sustainable agricultureBusinessEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningGeographyEconomicsSociologyBiologyEcologyComputer scienceEndangered species

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Conservation of agrobiodiversity is an important component of sustainable agriculture and is important internationally. Ex situ conservation in genebanks has been the dominant strategy. Recently, in situ conservation has been advocated as a complementary strategy. This review (1) defines the context of agrobiodiversity conservation, (2) discusses its value and measurement, (3) explores the advantages and disadvantages of ex situ and in situ conservation approaches, and (4) outlines the importance of seed exchange and ethical concerns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it