Phase II Study of Weekly Vinblastine in Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of single-agent vinblastine in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory low-grade glioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were eligible if they had experienced previous treatment failure (chemotherapy and/or radiation) for incompletely resected or unresectable low-grade glioma (LGG). Vinblastine (6 mg/m(2)) was administered weekly for 1 year unless unacceptable toxicity or progression (confirmed on two consecutive imaging studies) occurred. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (age range, 1.4 to 18.2 years; median age, 7.2 years) were prospectively enrolled onto this phase II study. Fifty patients had previously received at least one prior regimen of chemotherapy, and 10 patients had previously received radiation treatment. Fifty patients were evaluable for response; 18 patients (36%) had a complete, partial, or minor response, and 31 patients completed 1 year of treatment. At a median follow-up of 67 months, 23 patients had not experienced progression; three patients have died. Five-year overall survival was 93.2% ± 3.8%, and 5-year progression-free survival was 42.3% ± 7.2%. Toxicity was manageable and mostly hematologic, although a few patients needed transfusions. CONCLUSION: Weekly vinblastine seems to be a reasonable alternative to radiation for pediatric patients with LGG who have experienced treatment failure with first-line chemotherapy. The 5-year progression-free survival observed in this phase II trial is comparable to results observed with first-line chemotherapy in chemotherapy-naive patients. The role of single-agent vinblastine and other vinca alkaloid in the management of pediatric LGGs deserves further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".