MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148555353 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1999.808020

Interpolation using elliptic sine function: a digital signal processing approach

2003· article· en· W2148555353 on OpenAlexaff
Sazzadur Chowdhury, J.J. Soltis, William C. Miller

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpolation (computer graphics)SineBilinear interpolationDigital filterJacobian matrix and determinantRealization (probability)Trigonometric interpolationComputer scienceSignal processingAlgorithmMathematicsLinear interpolationElliptic filterSIGNAL (programming language)Digital signal processingFilter (signal processing)Multivariate interpolationBicubic interpolationLow-pass filterApplied mathematicsArtificial intelligencePrototype filterComputer visionComputer hardwareGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interpolation is necessary in digital signal processing applications to increase the sampling rate of a digital signal. Realization of interpolation in practice becomes fundamentally a linear filtering process. Classical interpolation methods like Lagrange can be used with some limitations for filtering an interpolated signal. This paper introduces a new method of interpolation using the Jacobian elliptic sine function that can be applied to digital signal processing applications. The paper provides a mathematical model to design an interpolator based on the Jacobian elliptic sine function and compares its merits and demerits to a FIR filter and filters derived from Lagrange interpolation method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207