MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148555761 · doi:10.5430/air.v1n2p171

Application of Bayesian Network to stock price prediction

2012· article· en· W2148555761 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eisuke Kita, Masaaki Harada, Takao Mizuno

Bibliographic record

VenueArtificial Intelligence Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersToyota Motor Corporation
KeywordsStock priceStock (firearms)EconometricsComputer scienceMean squared prediction errorBayesian probabilityAlgorithmEconomicsArtificial intelligenceSeries (stratigraphy)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Authors present the stock price prediction algorithm by using Bayesian network. The present algorithm uses the networktwice. First, the network is determined from the daily stock price and then, it is applied for predicting the daily stock pricewhich was already observed. The prediction error is evaluated from the daily stock price and its prediction. Second, thenetwork is determined again from both the daily stock price and the daily prediction error and then, it is applied for thefuture stock price prediction. The present algorithm is applied for predicting NIKKEI stock average and Toyota motorcorporation stock price. Numerical results show that the maximum prediction error of the present algorithm is 30% inNIKKEI stock average and 20% in Toyota Motor Corporation below that of the time-series prediction algorithms such asAR, MA, ARMA and ARCH models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtificial Intelligence ResearchSame topicBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceFrench-language works237,207