MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148558022 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2007.4488742

Design-specific supply and threshold voltage optimization in nanometer era

2007· article· en· W2148558022 on OpenAlexaff
Kian Haghdad, Mohab Anis

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCadenceThreshold voltageVoltageComputer sciencePower–delay productLeakage (economics)Power optimizationDynamic voltage scalingPower (physics)Very-large-scale integrationNonlinear systemElectronic engineeringOptimal designEnergy (signal processing)Integrated circuit designEfficient energy useMathematical optimizationControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringTransistorEngineeringMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the scaling of VLSI technology and increase in leakage power, energy efficiency emerges as a design principle. This paper presents a methodology for constrained based optimization of energy-delay and finding the optimal associated supply and threshold voltages. These constraints are maximum temperature, maximum delay, EDP, and leakage to dynamic power ratio. Moreover, three methods for the continuous nonlinear optimization are compared where the problem is linearized in order to reduce the execution time. The methodology is illustrated for optimization of the energy delay product (EDP) subject to the design constraints but it is also applicable to other design metrics such as power-delay product (PDP) and power energy product (PEP). The results have been verified in 90 nm technology using Cadence Spectre simulator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedingsSame topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207