MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2148564595 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511529504.020

Chemical abundances

2000· book-chapter· en· W2148564595 on OpenAlexaff
Sun Kwok

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2000
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsStarsGalaxyNucleosynthesisInterstellar mediumStellar evolutionAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Progenitors of PN play an important role in the chemical enrichment of the Galaxy because He and significant amounts of C and N are produced by nucleosynthesis during the MS, RG, and AGB stages of their evolution. These elements are brought to the surface of the star by convection events called dredge ups (Iben, 1991). The first dredge up occurs in all stars on the RGB following the exhaustion of H in the core. Convection extending into the interior brings material processed in the CNO cycle to the surface. The second dredge-up occurs only in higher mass (≥3 M ⊙ ) stars during the early AGB phase and results in an increase in the surface abundance of 4 He and 14 N at the expense of 12 C and 16 O. The third dredge-up occurs on the AGB after each He-shell flash, resulting in He, C, and s -process elements being brought to the surface (Renzini and Voli, 1981). This repeated enhancement of C abundance in the stellar surface may in some stars bring the C/O ratio to be greater than unity. Since the less abundant of these two elements is completely tied up in the CO molecule, the photospheric spectrum of the star will change from O-based (e.g., TiO and VO) to C-based (e.g., C 2 and CN), and a carbon star is created (see Section 10.2). Stellar winds during the AGB eject these elements from the stellar surface and therefore enrich the interstellar medium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooks→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→