MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148574001 · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvq350

MicroRNAs and atrial fibrillation: new fundamentals

2010· review· en· W2148574001 on OpenAlexaff
Zhiguo Wang, Yuxiang Lu, Baoyu Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiovascular Research · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA regulation and disease
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsmicroRNAAtrial fibrillationBioinformaticsCardiac arrhythmiaComputational biologyFunction (biology)GeneGene expressionBiologyMedicineNeuroscienceInternal medicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly encountered clinical arrhythmia associated with pronounced morbidity, mortality, and socio-economic burden. This pathological entity is associated with an altered expression profile of genes that are important for atrial function. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a new class of non-coding mRNAs of around 22 nucleotides in length, have rapidly emerged as one of the key players in the gene expression regulatory network. The potential roles of miRNAs in controlling AF have recently been investigated. The studies have provided some promising results for our better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of AF. In this review article, we provide a synopsis of the studies linking miRNAs to cardiac excitability and other processes pertinent to AF. To introduce the main topic, we discuss basic knowledge about miRNA biology and our current understanding of mechanisms for AF. The most up-to-date research data on the possible roles of miRNAs in AF initiation and maintenance are presented, and the available experimental results on miRNA and AF are discussed. Some speculations pertinent to the subject are made. Finally, perspectives on future directions of research on miRNAs in AF are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiovascular ResearchSame topicRNA regulation and diseaseFrench-language works237,207