MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148603189 · doi:10.4141/p06-034

Neurotransmitters, neuroregulators and neurotoxins in the life of plants

2006· article· en· W2148603189 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jin Cao, Ian B. Cole, Susan J. Murch

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperforinBiologyArabidopsisNeurotransmitterGlutamate receptorNeurochemicalMelatoninNeurotransmissionHypericum perforatumMutantReceptorNeuroscienceBiochemistryPharmacologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent evidence has shown that neurologically active compounds play an important role in the physiology of higher plants. The human neurotransmitter melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine) has been found in more than 140 different plant species and is associated with flower and seed development, reproductive capacity and root growth. Hyperforin, once thought to be characteristic of St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum L.), has now been found in several other plant species and preliminary findings indicate that it may function as a modulator of plant cell polarity and ion flow. The excitotoxin, β-methylamino-L-alanine, has been used to selectively isolate glutamate receptor mutants in Arabidopsis, and these studies are leading to new understandings of plant cell development. The study of these and other plant neurochemicals may lead to a new understanding of plant signal transmission and the mechanisms by which plant cells sense, interpret and respond to environmental cues. Key words: Neurotransmitter, neurotoxin, medicinal plant, plant cell signalling, melatonin, hyperforin

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicPlant Molecular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207