Sanctionner les (non-) coupables. Préciser la disposition de non-responsabilité criminelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’appellation NRC (non-responsabilité criminelle) subit d’importantes modifications législatives qui accordent une plus grande attention à la sécurité publique et aux renseignements pour les victimes et qui visent également la création de la désignation « à haut risque ». Au Canada, cette appellation a un historique contradictoire qui accentue la complexité à superposer les structures thérapeutique et punitive. Les dernières modifications à la désignation NRC sont une réaction punitive aux réclamations du grand public quant à sa sécurité et à sa protection, ainsi qu’à une perte de confiance dans la capacité de la psychologie et des disciplines connexes à traiter et à gérer les accusés atteints de troubles mentaux. Par conséquent, l’appellation NRC a acquis une rhétorique punitive malgré le fait qu’elle est formulée en dehors du système de sanctions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".