MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148616923

Regression Analysis as a Managerial Research Tool: A Practical Illustration of Demand Analysis in Pakistan

2015· article· en· W2148616923 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Furrukh Bashir Ahmad Bilal Khilji, Altaf Hussain Waqar Younas

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Business and Management · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrice elasticity of demandEconomicsToothpasteRegression analysisRevenueEconometricsQuarter (Canadian coin)Demand curveOn demandCross elasticity of demandElasticity (physics)MicroeconomicsPrice elasticity of supplyStatisticsMathematicsDentistryCommerceMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study is aimed at analyzing demand estimation and forecasting using regression analysis as a Managerial research tool. The article is about estimating demand of Medicam Toothpaste by viewing the effect of various variables like price of Medicam toothpaste, price of Shield toothbrush, price of Colgate toothpaste, advertisement and total revenue on the demand as well as its forecast for the next quarter. The methodology used is multiple regressions using Ordinary least Square method applied on time series data of 1 st quarter of 2007 to 2 nd quarter of 2014. Coefficients of price of Medicam and price of shield toothbrush show negative association with demand of Medicam toothpaste in Pakistan. The coefficients attached with price of Colgate toothpaste, Advertisement and total revenue of the firm are positively related with demand of Medicam toothpaste. Price elasticity of demand is -0.156, cross price elasticity of demand w. r. t. price of Colgate is 0.014, and w. r. t. price of shield tooth paste is - 0.059, advertisement elasticity of demand is 0.076 and total sales elasticity of demand is 0.0247. The forecast result shows that the demand has increased in the 3 rd quarter of 2014 having demand of 48181.53 units. Keywords: Demand estimation, Demand Forecasting, Elasticities of demand, Regression Analysis, Managerial Research Tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Business and ManagementSame topicEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsFrench-language works237,207