La pêche à Terre-Neuve et le commerce international : deux activités complémentaires au XVIe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article étudie la pêche à Terre-Neuve dans la seconde moitié du xvie siècle à partir de 415 polices d’assurance enregistrées devant le Consulat de Burgos, un des principaux centres d’assurance en Europe à cette époque. Ces documents détaillent d’une part les caractéristiques desdits voyages : prix, dangers encourus, participants, destination, routes, provenance des bateaux et des marins, etc. Ils sont à replacer parmi les 10 397 polices d’assurance conservées qui permettent de reconstituer au total 4743 expéditions entre 1565 et 1619. On constate que les maîtres, les propriétaires et les équipages des navires combinaient la pêche à Terre-Neuve avec le commerce international qui formaient deux activités complémentaires, sans qu’il y ait spécialisation entre les différentes activités. Les flottes espagnoles, portugaises et françaises développaient un pluriactivité, moyen de diversifier les affaires et par voie de conséquence de répartir les risques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".