MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148627901 · doi:10.1139/w09-111

Molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in food samples based on the protein A gene polymorphic region DNA sequence

2010· article· en· W2148627901 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammad Mehdi Soltan-Dallal, Zohreh Salehipour, Jalil Fallah Mehrabadi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStaphylococcus aureusBiologyAmpliconGenotypingPolymerase chain reactionGenotypeMolecular epidemiologyRestriction fragment length polymorphismMicrobiologyGeneGeneticsTypingMultilocus sequence typingBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Foodborne disease due to Staphylococcus aureus is a common and important disease worldwide. Molecular typing of S. aureus strains plays a crucial role in epidemiological studies examining the origin and performing surveillance of major infections. In this survey, we collected 913 food samples and detected 93 S. aureus isolates by using culture and biochemical tests. Subsequently, the X region of the protein A gene was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and amplicons were digested with HaeII and HindIII. Seven different patterns, ranging in length between 1200 and 1600 bp, showed gene polymorphism of the spa gene. The most prevalent spa types were D (20%) and C (16%) in dairy products and D (6%) and E (3%) in meat products. Consequently, 16 genotypes were obtained by HaeII digestion. Typeability of PCR - restriction fragment length polymorphism in genotyping of S. aureus strains in our study was perfect. Therefore, this method is a reliable, rapid, and powerful system in epidemiological investigations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207