MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148637821 · doi:10.7202/1007771ar

La peur de « passer pour des Sauvages »

2012· article· fr· W2148637821 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Denys Delâge

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers des dix · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La colonisation française en Amérique du Nord s’est caractérisée par un modèle métis de relations avec les Autochtones dont les cultures ont inspiré la critique sociale de l’occident. Après la Conquête et la cession de 1763, les francophones ont refoulé la part amérindienne en eux afin de réclamer des droits identitaires à titre de civilisés. Outre une longue histoire commune et une profonde inter influence, ils partageaient également avec les Autochtones, un statut analogue de « nation-enfant » et conquise. Placés dans la position ambiguë de colonisateurs colonisés, ils se sont définis dans le seul héritage de la France en justifiant leur proximité avec les Amérindiens par leur mission civilisatrice. Le Canada français serait géographiquement d’Amérique, mais non pas culturellement parce que, selon ses élites, sans créolité. La peur de passer pour des Sauvages serait constitutive de la honte de soi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers des dixSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207