Performances of linear tools and models for error detection and concealment in subband image transmission
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the performances of Gaussian modeling and linear prediction tools for error detection and concealment in the transmission of still images. We consider the transmission of subband encoded images through two types of channels. We model the residual correlation between subband coefficients by considering them as jointly Gaussian variables. The first transmission medium considered is a packet-oriented channel, where some packets are lost during transmission. The problem is to estimate the values of missing coefficients. In this case, particular care must be taken while evaluating correlation matrices from incomplete data. The other system considered is based on a discrete memoryless noisy channel affecting the data being transmitted. The challenge is here first to determine the locations of the errors--which is done through hypotheses tests--and then to replace them by estimates based on their neighbors. The reconstruction via linear prediction is shown to give better results than median filtering based reconstruction. Error detection through this Gaussian model also shows promising results, in particular when channel statistics are taken into account in a joint source-channel decoding framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it