MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148692647 · doi:10.1142/s0219455406001964

AXI-SYMMETRIC WAVE PROPAGATION OF CARBON NANOTUBES WITH NON-LOCAL ELASTIC SHELL MODEL

2006· article· en· W2148692647 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShell (structure)Carbon nanotubeSHELL modelWave propagationMechanicsPhase (matter)PhysicsMode (computer interface)Phase velocityClassical mechanicsMaterials scienceNanotechnologyComposite materialOpticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A non-local elastic shell model is proposed for the first time in this study for considering the small-scale effect in axi-symmetric wave propagation in carbon nanotubes (CNTs). Two coupled radial and longitudinal modes, and one decoupled torsional mode, are derived from the developed non-local shell model. The small-scale effect on wave propagation is numerically studied and discussed. In addition, the cut-off frequency based on the non-local shell model is obtained, which is found to be free of the small-scale effect. It is interesting to note that only one asymptotic phase velocity exists in the CNTs using the non-local shell model, whereas two asymptotic phase velocities can be predicted using the classical or local elastic shell model. It is hoped the research presented herein can be used as a benchmark for future studies on the wave propagation of CNTs with non-local continuum models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.546
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it