MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148704323 · doi:10.1142/s0218127404009247

A STUDY ON THE EXISTENCE OF LIMIT CYCLES OF A PLANAR SYSTEM WITH THIRD-DEGREE POLYNOMIALS

2004· article· en· W2148704323 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematicsPlanarLimit cycleDegree (music)Degenerate energy levelsLimit (mathematics)Perturbation (astronomy)Dynamical systems theoryMathematical analysisPolynomialAmplitudeDifferential equationFocus (optics)Applied mathematicsPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The focus of the paper is mainly on the existence of limit cycles of a planar system with third-degree polynomial functions. A previously developed perturbation technique for computing normal forms of differential equations is employed to calculate the focus values of the system near equilibrium points. Detailed studies have been provided for a number of cases with certain restrictions on system parameters, giving rise to a complete classification for the local dynamical behavior of the system. In particular, a sufficient condition is established for the existence of k small amplitude limit cycles in the neighborhood of a high degenerate critical point. The condition is then used to show that the system can have eight and ten small amplitude (local) limit cycles for a set of particular parameter values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it