Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se veut un examen critique de la première collaboration entre Robert Lepage et le Cirque du Soleil, qualifiés par Susan Bennett comme deux des « plus précieux produits (culturels) d’exportation » du Québec. KÀ, qui a débuté au MGM Grand Hotel de Las Vegas en 2005, est considéré comme la production la plus onéreuse jamais montée en Amérique du Nord. Elle constitue une tentative pour mélanger le théâtre avec quelques-unes des tropes de la performance aérienne qui ont fait la réputation du Cirque. Cet article traite de la production de KÀ dans le double parcours du Cirque et de Lepage et défend la thèse suivant laquelle ses créateurs, en dépit d’avoir formulé une proposition scénique visuellement époustouflante et techniquement innovante, n’ont sans doute pas totalement saisi les défis esthétiques que représentait l’union de leur entreprise créative respective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".