The involvement of aggrecan polymorphism in degeneration of human intervertebral disc and articular cartilage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The functions of the intervertebral disc and of articular cartilage are intimately related to their aggrecan content. Aggrecan is a proteoglycan that interacts with hyaluronan to form large aggregates, which are responsible for the ability of the tissues to resist compressive loads. This function is related to the structure of aggrecan, and in particular to the large number of chondroitin sulphate chains present on its core protein. The chondroitin sulphate chains are present in two adjacent regions of the aggrecan core protein, termed the CS1 and CS2 domains. In the human, the region of the aggrecan gene encoding the CS1 domain exhibits size polymorphism, which can result in variation in the degree of chondroitin sulphate substitution of aggrecan in different individuals. This raises the possibility that the functional properties of aggrecan may vary between individuals, and that those individuals with an inferior aggrecan structure may be more susceptible to premature intervertebral disc or articular cartilage degeneration. Several studies have been performed to demonstrate such an association, but the results have been ambiguous. This review explains the relationship between aggrecan structure and function, describes the technique used to assess aggrecan polymorphism and the conclusions and limitations of the data obtained to date, and discusses the implications for tissue degeneration and clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".