A significant range extension for the Chestnut Dunnart <i>Sminthopsis archeri</i> (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae) in north Queensland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Chestnut Dunnart Sminthopsis archeri is a rarely encountered dasyurid. Only a handful of records is known from the tropical savannas of northern Cape York Peninsula and southern Papua New Guinea (Van Dyck 1986; Flannery 1995). Within Australia the species was previously considered endemic to Cape York Peninsula (Winter and Lethbridge 1995). Despite almost two decades of search effort throughout Cape York Peninsula very few recent records have surfaced (Winter and Atherton 1985; Woolley 1993; see review of unpublished in Winter and Lethbridge 1995). The last documented capture of S. archeri was in 1993 in the Iron Range area (Leung et al. 1994). Sminthopsis archeri has been previously captured in tall Eucalyptus tetrodonta, Corymbia nesophila, Erythrophleum chlorostachys woodlands on red earth soils, though it is also known from tall heathlands (Leung et al. 1994; Flannery 1995; Van Dyck 1995; Winter and Lethbridge 1995). Data regarding biology, distribution and status are correspondingly scant and restricted to locality descriptions, breeding and morphometric features of captured animals (Van Dyck 1995). Sminthopsis archeri is classified as rare in Queensland (Queensland Government 1997) and data deficient in Commonwealth assessments (Maxwell et al. 1996). This note reports an exceptional new locality for the species, representing a significant range extension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".