Data visualization: From body sensor network to social networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sensors can capture very sensitive and valuable information without human intervention and send it to remote location. However, capturing sensory data from a body sensor network (BSN) and sending it to social networks is a challenging task. This is because it requires a number of distributed networks to work together seamlessly. The task becomes more challenging when both the BSN and the social networks are mobile. It requires a framework which can handle the mobility of both the BSN and members of social networks and can send the sensory data to the social networks for real-time visualization. In this paper, we propose an open source framework, named SenseFace, which seamlessly incorporates a four-tier network including a BSN, cellular network, Internet and an overlay network consisting of social networks, to pass sensory data from a mobile BSN to the overlay network. The overlay network can intelligently manage one's social network and produce different data visualization formats suitable for email, fax, voicemail, SMS, MMS, APRS network, IM networks such as hotmail, gmail, yahoo, and existing social networks such as Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn, delicious, Wordpress etc. Finally, we present the framework design and the hardware and software that have been used for the implementation of the framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".