MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148757709 · doi:10.2174/1874276900802010005

Understanding Beta-Thalassemia with Focus on the Indian Subcontinent and the Middle East

2008· article· en· W2148757709 on OpenAlexafffund
R A Hegele, Piya Lahiry, S. A. Al-Attar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Open Hematology Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOntario GenomicsOntario Genomics InstituteGenome CanadaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsIndian subcontinentThalassemiaBeta thalassemiaMiddle EastGeneticsDiseaseMedicineBiologyGeographyInternal medicineAncient historyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beta-thalassemia is one of the most prevalent autosomal disorders in the world.Mutations in the HBB gene underlie deficiencies in hemoglobin production, which can interfere with oxygen delivery resulting in wide range of disease severity.Although >535 mutations have been characterized in the HBB gene, beta-thalassemia is broadly classified into three groups, based on clinical severity: beta-thalassemia major, beta-thalassemia intermedia and beta-thalassemia minor.In this article we review: 1) the molecular and biochemical basis of beta-thalassemia; 2) clinical features; 3) the range of common molecular variants of beta-thalassemia in a subset of geographic regions within the Indian Subcontinent and the Middle East; 4) potential molecular diagnostics; and 5) current and future treatments.We suggest that efforts to more completely characterize the HBB mutation distribution in high-risk areas, such as the Indian Subcontinent and the Middle East, may lead to improved diagnosis with earlier and more effective intervention strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Open Hematology JournalSame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207