Soluble sugar content of white spruce (<i>Picea glauca</i>) seeds during and after germination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In white spruce ( Picea glauca [Moench.] Voss.) seeds, the raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFOs) provide carbon reserves for the early stages of germination prior to radicle protrusion. Some seedlots contain seeds that are dormant, failing to complete germination under optimal conditions. Since dormancy may be imposed through a metabolic block in reserve mobilization, the goal of this project was to identify any impediment to RFO mobilization in dormant relative to nondormant seeds. Desiccated seeds contain primarily, and in order of abundance on a molar basis, sucrose and the first 3 members of the RFOs, raffinose, stachyose and verbascose. Upon radicle protrusion at 25°C, the contents of RFOs decreased to low amounts in all seed parts, regardless of prior dormancy status and sucrose was metabolized to glucose and fructose, which increased in seed parts. During moist chilling at 4°C, RFO content initially decreased before stabilizing and then increasing. In seeds that did not complete germination, the synthesis of RFOs at 4°C favored verbascose, so that at the end of 14 (nondormant) or 35 (dormant) weeks, verbascose contents in megagametophytes exceeded the amount initially present in the desiccated seed. This was also true in the embryos of the dormant seedlot. In seed parts from both seedlots after months of moist chilling, stachyose amounts exceeded raffinose amounts. Upon radicle protrusion at 4°C, RFO contents decreased to amounts most similar to those present in seeds that completed germination at 25°C. Hence, the RFOs are utilized as a source of energy, regardless of the temperature at which white spruce seeds complete germination. Based on the similarity of sugar contents in seed parts between dormant and nondormant seeds that did not complete germination, differences in sugar metabolism are probably not the basis of dormancy in white spruce seeds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".