Cyclo-P<sub>3</sub> Complexes of Vanadium: Redox Properties and Origin of the <sup>31</sup>P NMR Chemical Shift
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The synthesis and characterization of two high-valent vanadium-cyclo-P3 complexes, (nacnac)V(cyclo-P3)(Ntolyl2) (1) and (nacnac)V(cyclo-P3)(OAr) (2), and an inverted sandwich derivative, [(nacnac)V(Ntolyl2)]2(μ2-η(3):η(2)-cyclo-P3) (3), are presented. These novel complexes are prepared by activating white phosphorus (P4) with three-coordinate vanadium(II) precursors. Structural metrics, redox behavior, and DFT electronic structure analysis indicate that a [cyclo-P3](3-) ligand is bound to a V(V) center in monomeric species 1 and 2. A salient feature of these new cyclo-P3 complexes is their significantly downfield shifted (by ∼300 ppm) (31)P NMR resonances, which is highly unusual compared to related complexes such as (Ar[(i)Pr]N)3Mo(cyclo-P3) (4) and other cyclo-P3 complexes that display significantly upfield shifted resonances. This NMR spectroscopic signature was thus far thought to be a diagnostic property for the cyclo-P3 ligand related to its acute endocyclic angle. Using DFT calculations, we scrutinized and conceptualized the origin of the unusual chemical shifts seen in this new class of complexes. Our analysis provides an intuitive rational paradigm for understanding the experimental (31)P NMR spectroscopic signature by relating the nuclear magnetic shielding with the electronic structure of the molecule, especially with the characteristics of metal-cyclo-P3 bonding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".