MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148889608 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2001.922362

A new PLL design for clock management applications

2002· article· en· W2148889608 on OpenAlexafffund
I. Brynjolfson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsVoltage-controlled oscillatorPhase-locked loopJitterPLL multibitComputer scienceElectronic engineeringBandwidth (computing)Control theory (sociology)VoltageEngineeringElectrical engineeringControl (management)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a novel Phase-Locked Loop (PLL) design for clock management applications. Such PLLs should operate over a wide range of frequencies, have tight constraints on jitter, power consumption and acquisition time, while being dynamically programmable by software means. In addition to the conventional fine tuning loop, the PLL has a coarse tuning loop to control the operating range by varying the number of delay cells in the voltage controlled oscillator (VCO). As a result, the VCO bandwidth is extended, operation is limited to the linear region and jitter is reduced. Low-power design of the VCO, including length controller is presented. This PLL design also reduces the complexity of dynamic software control by eliminating VCO length adjustment from outside control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207