Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine les discours et les valeurs professionnelles construits en France à propos du tourisme culturel. On observe les interactions entre des personnes pour qui le « tourisme culturel » constitue un espace commun de travail ou de confrontation : des agents des institutions culturelles et touristiques nationales et locales, des responsables associatifs et des opérateurs privés. Ces acteurs rejouent le divorce historique entre tourisme et culture, en opposant privé et public, commerce et culture, rentabilité et démocratisation. Cependant, dans notre enquête, ceux qui défendent les valeurs de l’efficacité commerciale sont, pour la plupart, les responsables institutionnels de villes qui n’intéressent peu ou pas l’industrie touristique. Tout se passe comme si la référence permanente au marché était, pour eux, un moyen de trouver une légitimité en invoquant un ordre de valeur posé comme distinct de celui de la culture, alors même que cet ordre n’est, a priori , pas le leur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".