MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148899509 · doi:10.1109/modsym.1990.201037

A 1 MHz chopper for injection into the TRIUMF KAON Factory

2002· article· en· W2148899509 on OpenAlexaff
C.B. Figley, G.D. Wait, Michael Barnes

Bibliographic record

VenueNineteenth IEEE Symposium on Power Modulators · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChopperPhysicsElectrical engineeringBeam (structure)Duty cycleOpticsNuclear physicsVoltageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proposed KAON Factory expansion to the TRIUMF facility requires a high repetition rate beam chopper for injecting a 450 MeV H/sup -/ beam into the accumulator ring. The chopper must deflect the beam alternately for 49 or 92 ns. The rise and fall times of the field in the deflector must be less than 39 ns including the fill time of the deflector assembly. This represents a 22% duty cycle (including rise times) at a repetition rate of 1.0244 MHz to 1.0251 MHz. The chopper must provide an integral kick during the pulse of 200 kV/m*m (electric field*length). The deflector assembly will be between 1.8 m and 4.0 m long with the plate spacing between 5 cm and 10 cm. Traditional kickers were found to be inefficient, expensive or impractical when scaled to the high repetition rate and fast rise time required by the chopper. A novel technique for increasing the energy efficiency while maintaining pulse quality is being evaluated. The concept incorporates a low-loss transmission line on which pulses are stored; these pulses are used to deflect the beam and are then returned to the line for reshaping. Studies indicate that significantly less power is consumed compared to other techniques.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineteenth IEEE Symposium on Power ModulatorsSame topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207