MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148949976 · doi:10.1142/s0129167x02001526

A COMPLETE SET OF ISOMETRIC IMPLEMENTERS FOR A QUASI-FREE ENDOMORPHISM OF THE CAR ALGEBRA VIA UNITARY DILATIONS

2002· article· en· W2148949976 on OpenAlexaff
Michael J. Gabriel

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mathematics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndomorphismMathematicsUnitary stateSurjective functionAutomorphismAlgebra over a fieldPure mathematicsSet (abstract data type)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we concern ourselves with non-surjective quasi-free endomorphisms of the CAR algebra. More precisely we give a construction of a complete set of isometric implementers for such an endomorphism in a fixed pure quasi-free state, the approach to which is more natural than has previously been proposed. The key idea in this construction is the use of the unitary implementers of an associated quasi-free automorphism in a set of carefully chosen quasi-free states. Our treatment is also novel in that we provide a sequence of implementers within the framework of the complex formalism of the CAR algebra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of MathematicsSame topicAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchFrench-language works237,207