MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148960546 · doi:10.3109/09638288.2011.645110

WOMAC-pf as a measure of physical function in patients with Parkinson’s disease and late-onset sequels of poliomyelitis: unidimensionality and item behaviour

2012· article· en· W2148960546 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martijn Steultjens, Janneke M. Stolwijk-Swüste, Leo D. Roorda, Annet J. Dallmeijer, Gabriella M. van Dijk, Bart Post, Joost Dekker

Bibliographic record

VenueDisability and Rehabilitation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRasch modelWOMACPolytomous Rasch modelDifferential item functioningPhysical therapyMedicinePsychometricsPsychologyOsteoarthritisPhysical medicine and rehabilitationClinical psychologyItem response theoryDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To assess psychometric properties of the Western Ontario and MacMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)-pf, an osteoarthritis (OA)-specific questionnaire used to establish the level of physical functioning in patients with late-onset sequels of poliomyelitis (LOSP) and Parkinson's disease (PD). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Unidimensionality (using principal component analyses [PCA] and Rasch analyses) was separately established for three diagnostic groups: OA (n = 288), LOSP (n = 168) and PD (n = 200). Additionally, differential item functioning (DIF) among the three diagnostic groups was assessed using ordinal regression (Polytomous Universal Model) analyses. Baseline data were used from an ongoing cohort study of these three patient populations. RESULTS: Unidimensionality was adequate, with all items loading on the first principal component. The Rasch analyses revealed that item fit was generally good. Uniform and non-uniform DIF were found to be present among the three diagnostic groups in three and one of the 17 physical functioning subscale (WOMAC-pf) items, respectively. CONCLUSION: The WOMAC-pf is a unidimensional measure of physical functioning in patients with LOSP and PD, in addition to its established use in OA. [ IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: • Disability in physical functioning related to mobility(walking, stair climbing, etc.) is a common feature of many chronic diseases, including osteoarthritis, late-onset sequels of poliomyelitis and Parkinson's disease.• In this study, the Western Ontario and MacMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index-pf was shown to bea useful and adequate tool to assess physical functioning in these patient groups.• The study highlighted that, despite differences in diagnosis,history and course of the disease, patients with different conditions experience similar disabilities in their physical functioning.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDisability and RehabilitationSame topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesFrench-language works237,207