What is wrong with the right ventricle after surgical closure of a ventricular septal defect?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The outcomes of patients after surgical closure of a ventricular septal defect (VSD) performed during infancy or childhood is considered to be excellent with low long-term morbidity and mortality.1–3 In most congenital heart centres, patients after surgical VSD closure are discharged from follow-up if there are no known significant residual lesions such as a residual VSD, aortic regurgitation, or subaortic stenosis. This probably explains why there are very few long-term follow-up studies on one of the most common indications for congenital heart surgery. The study by Heiberg et al. 4 looked at a small group of adult patients who underwent surgical closure of a VSD during infancy or childhood. The authors studied left and right ventricular structure and function using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) in 27 young adult patients (mean age 20.5 years) who underwent surgical VSD closure around 1.9 years of age. All patients were clinically asymptomatic. The authors observed that the RVs …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".