MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148988443 · doi:10.7202/030590ar

La voix chantée du silence

2005· article· fr· W2148988443 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Simon Harel

Bibliographic record

VenueProtée · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSilencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

De nombreux travaux ont été consacrés à la mise en jeu de l'autobiographie dans l'oeuvre de Michel Leiris. La très grande majorité de ces recherches ont mis l'accent sur l'association du code scripturaire et du référent corporel, ce dernier tenant lieu de matrice contenante de l'élan créateur. Cet article propose une réflexion sur la sémiotisation de l'oralité et du silence dans les écrits tardifs que sont Opérratiques et À cor et à cri . De façon très significative, ces écrits de Michel Leiris renouent avec une préoccupation poétique fondamentale abandonnée en 1925. Que signifie ce passage du regard à la voix du silence dans l'oeuvre tardive de Michel Leiris ? Comment comprendre l'abandon progressif des représentations du monde théâtral et tauromachique, associées chez Leiris à l'espace autobiographique, au profit du temps de la voix qui devient la forme vive et silencieuse du récit de soi ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProtéeSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207