MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148992969 · doi:10.1002/aic.690490713

Tracking control of general nonlinear differential‐algebraic equation systems

2003· article· en· W2148992969 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIChE Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityLakehead University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemRegularization (linguistics)Algebraic numberTracking (education)MathematicsController (irrigation)Nonlinear controlDifferential (mechanical device)Algebraic equationComputer scienceMathematical optimizationControl (management)EngineeringMathematical analysisArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The problem of output tracking control is considered for a general class of nonlinear differential‐algebraic systems. Regularization algorithm proposed here provides sufficient conditions for the existence of a regularizing feedback controller that renders the closed‐loop system to have an index one. Based on the regularization algorithm, another algorithm is developed for constructing a tracking controller, which guarantees that the outputs of the closed‐loop system track the desired signals asymptotically. Simulation results on a typical chemical process show that the developed design method gives a satisfactory control performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it