Gas‐liquid mass transfer in low‐ and medium‐consistency pulp suspensions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The volumetric gas—liquid mass transfer coefficient (kLa) was measured for low‐ and medium‐consistency pulp suspensions using the cobalt‐catalyzed sulfite oxidation technique. Mass transfer rates were measured in a high‐shear mixer for a range of operating parameters, including the rotor speed (N = 10 to 50 rev/s), gas void fraction (Xg = 0.10 to 0.40) and fibre mass concentration (Cm = 0.0 to 0.10). kLa measurements were compared with the macroscale flow regime in the vessel (characterized using photographic techniques) and correlated with energy dissipation, gas void fraction and suspension mass concentration in the mixer. We found that gas‐liquid mass transfer was significantly reduced in pulp suspensions, even for low suspension concentrations. Part of this reduction was associated with dissolved components leached from the fibres into the liquid phase. This could account for reductions in kLa of up to 30% when compared with distilled water. The fibres further reduced kLa, with the magnitude of the decrease depending on the fibre mass concentration. Correlations were developed for kLa and compared with results available in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".