MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149038507 · doi:10.7202/031835ar

Les relations entre travail et curriculum en Angleterre et au Pays de Galles : reconstruction ou démolition?

2007· article· fr· W2149038507 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Prue Huddleston, Helen Rainbird

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Education and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article analyse la relation entre le travail et le curriculum en Grande-Bretagne. La première partie porte sur les changements de la structure de l'emploi et ceux de la nature du travail; elle met l'accent sur leurs effets sur la demande de compétences professionnelles et de diplômes. La deuxième partie traite, plus en détail, les politiques gouvernementales concernant la formation professionnelle. La troisième partie est consacrée à l'analyse de plusieurs changements majeurs du curriculum dans le contexte de la réforme institutionnelle du système d'éducation. Finalement, les autrices se demandent si les concepts d'efficacité du curriculum hérités du XIXe siècle et de restriction des savoirs à transmettre aux besoins d'apprendre ne pourraient pas être utilisés pour caractériser, de façon appropriée, ces évolutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des sciences de l éducationSame topicHistorical Education and SocietyFrench-language works237,207