MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149046857 · doi:10.1109/tns.2009.2039804

A Sub-Nanosecond Time Interval Detection System Using FPGA Embedded I/O Resources

2010· article· en· W2149046857 on OpenAlexaff
Louis Arpin, Mélanie Bergeron, Marc‐André Tétrault, Roger Lecomte, Réjean Fontaine

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayTime-to-digital converterOversamplingComputer scienceSystem timeGate arrayElectronic engineeringTimestampComputer hardwareReal-time computingEngineeringBandwidth (computing)JitterClock signal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Time to Digital Converter (TDC) concept is quite useful to obtain crucial timing information for nuclear radiation detection such as PET imaging applications. The high resolution nature of TDCs makes them sensitive to process and temperature variations. Thus, a calibration procedure must often be performed to improve measurements. Moreover, field programmable gate array (FPGA)-based TDC exacerbates this problem because the transistor topology is fixed on the fabric for low cost purposes. A Sub-Nanosecond Time Interval Detection System, able to overcome process and temperature (PT) variations, was designed and implemented in an FPGA. Unlike other FPGA-based TDCs, this new solution uses embedded PT invariant digital delay lines and deserializers included in I/O ports, along with a stable clock oscillator resulting in low logic usage. The proposed design consists of oversampling digital signals to enable the creation of absolute timestamps down to 75 ps resolution (31.85 ps <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">RMS</sub> ). As a proof of concept, this paper reports timing resolution down to 321.5 ps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.436
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207