Numerical model verification and calibration of George Massey Tunnel using centrifuge models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dynamic soilstructure interaction analyses were carried out for the seismic retrofit design of the immersed George Massey Tunnel, both to predict and study soil liquefaction and related tunnel movements and to design ground improvement. The proposed ground improvement included ground densification using vibroreplacement stone columns along both sides of the tunnel and seismic gravel drains adjacent to the outer edge of the densified zones. The den sification and drainage were proposed to locally mitigate soil liquefaction and reduce displacements of the tunnel to tolerable levels. Centrifuge model tests with base shaking to simulate earthquake effects were conducted to verify and calibrate the numerical models. This included simulating the effects of ground densification and drainage on reme diating tunnel movements. This paper presents the principal results from the dynamic analyses, the centrifuge model design and testing procedure, the class A predictions of the centrifuge tests, and discussions of the centrifuge test results and numerical model calibrations.Key words: immersed tunnel, seismic retrofit, soil liquefaction, design verification, centrifuge testing, numerical calibration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it