MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149064642 · doi:10.1017/s1743921308018954

The Square Kilometre Array

2007· article· en· W2149064642 on OpenAlexaff
A. R. Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Astronomical Union · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpoch (astronomy)AstronomyPhysicsAngular resolution (graph drawing)CosmologyGalaxyRadio telescopeAstrometryTelescopeRadio astronomyDark energyGalactic astronomyAstrophysicsMilky WayStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The SKA is a global project to plan and construct the next-generation international radio telescope operating at metre to cm wavelengths. More than 50 institutes in 19 countries are involved in its development. The SKA will be an interferometric array with a collecting area of up to one million square metres and maximum baseline of at least 3000 km. The SKA reference design includes field-of-view expansion technology that will allow instantaneous imaging of up to several tens of degrees. The SKA is being designed to address fundamental questions in cosmology, physics and astronomy. The key science goals range from the epoch or re-ionization, dark energy, the formation and evolution of galaxies and large-scale structure, the origin and evolution of cosmic magnetism, strong-field tests of gravity and gravity wave detection, the cradle of life, and the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. The sensitivity, field-of-view and angular resolution of the SKA will make possible a program to create a multi-epoch data base of wide-angle relative astrometry to a few μas precision for ~10,000,000 radio sources with S > 10 μJy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0820.057

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Astronomical UnionSame topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207