MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149104346 · doi:10.3415/vcot-10-07-0109

Retrospective study of 476 tibial plateau levelling osteotomy procedures

2011· article· en· W2149104346 on OpenAlexaff
J. Dupuis, Jérôme Planté, Maxim Moreau, Matthieu Gatineau

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Veterinary Medical Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCruciate ligamentSurgeryMedical recordRetrospective cohort studyOsteotomyPopulationImplantAnterior cruciate ligament

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of subsequent 'pivot shift', meniscal tear and risk factors associated with complications of tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) and to assess clinical and owner perception outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Three hundred and forty-eight dogs that had undergone TPLO surgical procedures (n = 476 stifles). METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for the retrieval of information on breed, sex, age, body weight, clinical history, radiograph findings, pre- and postoperative tibial plateau angle, limb alignment, unilateral versus bilateral disease, condition of cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) and menisci, implant material, healing time and complications. Clinical and owner-assessed questionnaire outcomes were also recorded. RESULTS: Forty-six (9.7%) postoperative complications were reported. Twenty (4.2%) were classified as major complications requiring an additional surgical intervention, and 26 (5.5%) as minor complications. No risk factors associated with postoperative complications were identified. Ten (2.1%) subsequent meniscal injuries in the stifles with normal un- altered menisci at time of TPLO were reported with a median postoperative time of 9.5 months. Signs of postoperative 'pivot shift' were reported in 15 (3.1%) stifles. All stifles with a 'pivot shift' had a complete CCL rupture or a debrided partial CCL rupture; a medial menisectomy was identified as a risk factor for a 'pivot shift' (p = 0.02). Dogs with intact medial meniscus had a significantly higher activity level (p <0.0001) and a shorter time to peak function (p = 0.02) than dogs that underwent menisectomy according to an owner questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Dogs with TPLO and intact meniscus seemed to have a better and faster recovery than dogs with TPLO and menisectomy based on owner questionnaires. 'Pivot shift' was infrequent after TPLO surgery. All dogs with a 'pivot shift' had a complete CCL rupture or a debrided partial CCL rupture and menisectomy was identified as a risk factor for its occurrence. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Considering the relatively low rate of subsequent meniscal injury after TPLO, systematic medial meniscal release with TPLO may be unnecessary. The 'pivot shift' deserved further investigation to completely understand its mechanism, to identify its anatomic components and potential consequences on the stifle joint.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.217
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations137
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and TraumatologySame topicVeterinary Orthopedics and NeurologyFrench-language works237,207