MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149107142 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2004.842343

Demonstration of high-speed staggered lineup GaAsSb-InP unitraveling carrier photodiodes

2005· article· en· W2149107142 on OpenAlexaff
L. Zheng, Xiong Zhang, Yuping Zeng, Rao Tatavarti, S. P. Watkins, C. R. Bolognesi, S. Demiguel, Joe C. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNorth Carolina State University
KeywordsPhotodiodeOptoelectronicsGallium arsenideMaterials scienceEpitaxyDark currentIndium phosphideFabricationIndium gallium arsenidePhotodetectorConduction bandElectronOpticsPhysicsLayer (electronics)Nanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate staggered ("type-II") lineup lattice-matched GaAs/sub 0.51/Sb/sub 0.49/-InP unitraveling carrier photodiodes (UTC-PDs) for application near 1.55 μm. The GaAsSb absorbing layer conduction band edge lines up /spl Delta/E/sub C/=0.11 eV above that of InP, and hence, allows the direct injection of photogenerated electrons into an InP collector-without any need for compositional grading around the GaAsSb-InP interface-thus simplifying epitaxial growth and device fabrication. InP-GaAsSb UTC-PDs show low dark current levels, and measurable bandwidths are limited by the test equipment. A transit-limited bandwidth of 105 GHz for a PD with a 1000-GaAsSb absorption layer (C:5×10/sup 18//cm3) and a 2000 InP collector is inferred from the variation of photoresponse bandwidth with device area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Photonics Technology LettersSame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207