Back muscle fatigue during intermittent prone back extension exercise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to estimate the level of muscular activation and muscle fatigue of the low back muscles during the performance of an intermittent prone back extension (PBE) exercise. Forty-one healthy students (24 males and 17 females) lying prone on a bench with the legs fixed performed two maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) in extension, a maximum of 100 repetitions of an intermittent PBE exercise immediately followed by a final MVC in extension. In addition, 12 subjects (11 males and one female) repeated the PBE exercise but with the addition of a 45-N weight on the back. The PBE exercise consisted of a task broken into four 1-s segments, while lying prone on a bench (10 degrees below horizontal): (1) raising the trunk to a horizontal position; (2) holding the trunk in the static phase (10 degrees above horizontal); (3) returning to the original position; and (4) resting on the bench. Electromyography (EMG) was used to measure the level of muscle activity (erector spinae (ES), gluteus maximus (GM), hamstrings (HA)) relative to the maximum voluntary EMG (MVE). RESULTS: Most of the subjects (34 out of 41) completed the 100 repetitions without excessive muscle fatigue according to the post-exercise MVC values. The intermittent PBE increased fatigue in the lumbar and hip extensor muscles in terms of: (1) a decrease in the MVC; (2) an increase in the level of muscle activation; and (3) a decline of the median frequency (MF). There was no gender difference in all EMG measurements. The level of muscle activation in the hip extensors (GM and HA) was associated with task failure (number of repetitions <100) for some subjects and the addition of a weight of 45 N had more impact on HA than ES. In conclusion, the PBE exercise as performed in the present study (including rest intervals), although not very strenuous for our healthy subjects, seems an adequate exercise to measure and train the aerobic capacity of the back muscles. However, to train specifically the back muscles, the exercise must be adjusted to avoid task failure due to possible hip extensor fatigue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".