MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149237781 · doi:10.5006/1.3278320

Dependence of Stress Corrosion Crack Velocity on Strain Rate for a Binary Noble-Metal Alloy

2007· article· en· W2149237781 on OpenAlexaff
R. C. Newman

Bibliographic record

VenueCORROSION · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanoporous metals and alloys
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceStrain rateSlow strain rate testingIntergranular corrosionBrittlenessCorrosionMetallurgyCrackingStress corrosion crackingCleavage (geology)Stress (linguistics)Composite materialFracture (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A published analysis of crack growth rate under ohmic control in a slow strain rate test is modified slightly to take account of a crack growth mechanism involving periodic cleavage or brittle intergranular fracture nucleated by a dealloyed layer. Assuming that a critical layer thickness must form to trigger each cleavage event, and that a surface-dealloyed layer is available to start the process off at zero strain, we obtain the following result: at low strain rate (s), the dependence of crack velocity (v) on s is close to v ~ s0.5, while at high strain rate the slope increases smoothly until it becomes v ~ s. At the highest strain rates we are not really dealing with stress corrosion cracking, since all that is happening is a single brittle event at the start of the test, followed by plastic strain to failure. The results of this calculation are consistent with data published by Serebrinsky and Galvele, who interpreted the behavior using the surface mobility model, even at strain rates higher than 1,000%/s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCORROSIONSame topicNanoporous metals and alloysFrench-language works237,207