MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149271588 · doi:10.2113/50.4.478

Facies and sequence stratigraphy of two Cambrian grand cycles: implications for Cambrian sea level and origin of grand cycles

2002· article· en· W2149271588 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyFaciesPaleontologyStratigraphyCitationIconSequence stratigraphyOutcropSequence (biology)Library scienceTectonicsStructural basinComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| December 01, 2002 Facies and sequence stratigraphy of two Cambrian grand cycles: implications for Cambrian sea level and origin of grand cycles Ronald J. Spencer; Ronald J. Spencer Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Robert V. Demicco Robert V. Demicco Department of Geological Sciences & Environmental Studies, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, 13902-6000 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2002) 50 (4): 478–491. https://doi.org/10.2113/50.4.478 Article history received: 15 Aug 2001 accepted: 26 Aug 2002 first online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Ronald J. Spencer, Robert V. Demicco; Facies and sequence stratigraphy of two Cambrian grand cycles: implications for Cambrian sea level and origin of grand cycles. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 2002;; 50 (4): 478–491. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/50.4.478 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract The Pika, Arctomys and Waterfowl formations comprise two "grand cycles" as originally defined by Aitken (1966, 1978, 1981). A detailed across-strike facies stratigraphic reconstruction based on measured outcrop sections and subsurface data reveal that the Pika and Waterfowl Formations consist of five transgressive–regressive sequences of subtidal facies and tidal flat facies each up to 100 m thick and some 105 to 106 years duration. The bulk of the Arctomys Formation consists of terrestrial to marginal marine playa deposits, correlates with an unconformity in the adjacent subsurface, and was deposited during a sea level low stand. The upper third of the Arctomys Formation records a single minor marine transgressive–regressive cycle. Transgressive facies can extend eastward onto the craton up to 1000 km from the platform to slope transition and record local relative increases in sea level of various magfnitudes. Maximum transgressive or regressive phases do not necessarily correspond with the bottoms or tops of grand cycles. A sea level curve derived from our facies stratigraphy is different than the curve proposed by Bond et al. (1989) from R2 analysis, and also different to the sealevel curve of Montanez and Osleger (1993) for the southern Great Basin. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it