MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149292119 · doi:10.7202/1006206ar

L’extraction et le tatouage

2011· article· fr· W2149292119 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michel Peterson

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTattoo and Body Piercing Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

S’appuyant sur le cas d’un jeune demandeur d’asile africain, l’auteur montre comment un tatouage, changé de valence par des préjugés idéologiques, peut passer du statut de signifiant de filiation à celui de signifiant de dénégation, portant alors non plus la reconnaissance d’une origine digne, mais celle d’une transmission déshonorante. Dans la première partie, l’article examine quelques-uns des paramètres sociaux qui font du tatouage une écriture du désir. Il procède ensuite à l’examen de cette signature quand elle devient désastreuse pour le sujet en proie à l’errance. Il dégage ensuite quelques tracés surgis durant les séances analytiques pour en venir à montrer comment se joue progressivement une réappropriation de l’humanité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.432
GPT teacher head0.607
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicTattoo and Body Piercing ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207