MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149309951 · doi:10.1081/sta-200056847

Inference About the First-Order Autoregressive Coefficient

2005· article· en· W2149309951 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEstimatorAutoregressive modelMathematicsApplied mathematicsOrdinary least squaresLeast-squares function approximationStatisticsRepresentation (politics)M-estimatorSeries (stratigraphy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Several estimators of the coefficient of an AR(1) process can be expressed as the ratio of two quadratic forms. In this article, we are considering the ordinary least-squares, a modified least-squares, the Yule–Walker, and Burg's estimators. It will be shown that the modified least-squares estimator is the least biased and that the ordinary least-squares and Burg's estimators share very similar distributional properties. An integral representation of the moments of these estimators is provided and a methodology is proposed for correcting their bias. Bounds for the supports of the Yule–Walker and Burg's estimators are determined and the density functions of those estimators are then approximated in terms of Jacobi polynomials. Finally, confidence intervals for the autoregressive coefficient are determined from replicated series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.400 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it