Object-based Classification of High Resolution SAR Images for Within Field Homogeneous Zone Delineation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Delineating management zones is important in agriculture for implementing site-specific practices. We delineated within-field homogeneous zones over a corn and a wheat field using high spatial resolution multi-temporal airborne C-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery with an object-based fuzzy k-means classification approach. Image objects were generated by a segmentation procedure implemented in eCognition® software, and were classified as basic processing units using SAR data. Results were evaluated using analysis of variance and variance reduction of soil electrical conductivity (EC), leaf area index (LAI), and crop yield. The object-based approach provided better results than a pixel-based approach. The variance reduction in LAI, and soil EC varied with SAR acquisition time and incidence angle. Although the variance reduction of yield was not as significant as that of LAI and EC, average yield among the delineated zones were different in most cases. The SAR data classification produced interpretable patterns of soil and crop spatial variability, which can be used to infer within-field management zones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".