Family, social and personal variables in adolescent sex offenders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Differences between abused and nonabused adolescent male sex offenders on familial, social, and personal variables were investigated. Participants were 20 molested, and 19 non molested adolescent sex offenders, and a comparison group of 15 nonsex offending, juvenile delinquents. All participants completed questionnaires on family environment (Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales), peer support (People in My Life), and antisocial beliefs (Beliefs and Attitudes Scale). The adolescent’s care giver completed a measure of social isolation and conduct disorder in the adolescent (Child Behavior Checklist). Three significant ANOV As resulted for the Social Isolation scales of Withdrawn. Social Problems. and Social Participation. The three groups were on a continuum: molested sex offenders scored highest on Withdrawn and Social Problems and lowest on Social Participation, nonmolested adolescent sex offenders scored in the middle. while the comparison group scored lowest on Withdrawn and Social Proble...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".